<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Elegant Code - Latest Comments</title><link xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="http://api.friendfeed.com/2008/03#sup" href="http://disqus.com/sup/all.sup#forumcomments-bbaf89be" type="application/json"/><link>http://elegantcode01.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://elegantcode01.disqus.com/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 16 Jun 2013 13:10:41 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Going Top Gun on Your Code</title><link>http://elegantcode.com/2013/06/04/going-top-gun-on-your-code/#comment-932415054</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Fantastic.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Efford</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 16 Jun 2013 13:10:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Going Top Gun on Your Code</title><link>http://elegantcode.com/2013/06/04/going-top-gun-on-your-code/#comment-932392107</link><description>&lt;p&gt;yes.&lt;br&gt;yes.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David Starr</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 16 Jun 2013 12:33:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Taking Baby Steps with ScriptCS</title><link>http://elegantcode.com/2013/05/31/taking-baby-steps-with-scriptcs/#comment-928420266</link><description>&lt;p&gt;There is a proof of concept for Sublime Text here &lt;a href="https://github.com/PaulCampbell/OmniSharpSublimePlugin" rel="nofollow"&gt;https://github.com/PaulCampbel...&lt;/a&gt; . It's a long way behind the Vim plugin though.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jason Imison</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2013 20:29:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Going Top Gun on Your Code</title><link>http://elegantcode.com/2013/06/04/going-top-gun-on-your-code/#comment-926995508</link><description>&lt;p&gt;These features look great.&lt;br&gt;Will the "Head Up Display" features be accessible from the keyboard?&lt;br&gt;Will other test frameworks apart from MS test be supported?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Efford</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2013 17:55:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Going Top Gun on Your Code</title><link>http://elegantcode.com/2013/06/04/going-top-gun-on-your-code/#comment-925287399</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes - that sounds perfect.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrew MacNeill</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2013 13:08:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Going Top Gun on Your Code</title><link>http://elegantcode.com/2013/06/04/going-top-gun-on-your-code/#comment-925285011</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Actually, what I hear you asking for here is a new indicator that might be called "Call Hierarchy" which makes a lot of sense. Is that right?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David Starr</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2013 13:06:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Going Top Gun on Your Code</title><link>http://elegantcode.com/2013/06/04/going-top-gun-on-your-code/#comment-924931914</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Probably relationships. I'm likely looking about it the wrong way - as it would almost be impossible to define this but if my "SavePage" method called a method named "RecalculateScore" and that method called "CalculateFormula", it would be useful to see that tree when looking at the CalculateFormula Method.  Otherwise I would have to go to the RecalculateScore reference and then HeadsUp back to the Savepage.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;As one of the senior developers on a project, I'm trying to encourage the developers to think about where the code is REALLY being called from, instead of just the direct reference. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Imagine that in a "cloud" or "web" graph, a method that is only called a few times but those methods are then called by a piece of code that calls LOTS of other methods, That could be  a more important piece of code in terms of making changes affecting things, more than a piece of code that only has one access point.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I realize in writing this that what I'm describing is definitely out of scope for the "heads up display" but the way it appears just seems like it's calling out for a related add-in. If, in the interim I could define (somehow) that SavePage is an important part of the CalculateFormula method implementation, and that was part of the HeadsUp, it might prove useful.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It's very awesome - and as always, awesomeness just pushes for more awesomeness.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;(then again, I may simply be exposing some bad implementation decisions :) )&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrew MacNeill</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2013 05:16:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Going Top Gun on Your Code</title><link>http://elegantcode.com/2013/06/04/going-top-gun-on-your-code/#comment-924820334</link><description>&lt;p&gt;@Andrew, what is the relationship you are trying to navigate there?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Inheritance relationships, extensions, implementations, etc?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David Starr</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2013 00:54:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Going Top Gun on Your Code</title><link>http://elegantcode.com/2013/06/04/going-top-gun-on-your-code/#comment-923192092</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Very groovy (thanks B. Clay) --- it does make it easier to track those references...could have used it yesterday in fact.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;What would be really useful would be the ability to "DEFINE" some of those references for others. For example, if I could identify that code X really mattered to Code Y (even though the reference was a few layers down), and made those visible in the references section (with an explanation). Maybe it's based on some XML in the summary line - but that would be mucho useful as well&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrew MacNeill</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 08 Jun 2013 07:14:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Going Top Gun on Your Code</title><link>http://elegantcode.com/2013/06/04/going-top-gun-on-your-code/#comment-922802397</link><description>&lt;p&gt;There is no question that Git is on the horizon. We care about Git. Git is love. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David Starr</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2013 19:25:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Going Top Gun on Your Code</title><link>http://elegantcode.com/2013/06/04/going-top-gun-on-your-code/#comment-920039546</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'd love to see this include Mercurial and Git support in addition to TFS.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mike C</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2013 13:55:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Taking Baby Steps with ScriptCS</title><link>http://elegantcode.com/2013/05/31/taking-baby-steps-with-scriptcs/#comment-919900874</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Jason this looks pretty sweet. Can you port it to Sublime Text? :-)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Glenn Block</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2013 12:02:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Taking Baby Steps with ScriptCS</title><link>http://elegantcode.com/2013/05/31/taking-baby-steps-with-scriptcs/#comment-919900090</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Jason, not sure. However scriptcs will as we are not dependent on Mono / we have an engine abstraction. The mono support is in flight.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Glenn Block</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2013 12:01:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Going Top Gun on Your Code</title><link>http://elegantcode.com/2013/06/04/going-top-gun-on-your-code/#comment-919771911</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Looking forward to VS2013! These "Head Up Display"  features are very groovy ("cool" is so passe).&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">B. Clay Shannon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2013 10:06:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Taking Baby Steps with ScriptCS</title><link>http://elegantcode.com/2013/05/31/taking-baby-steps-with-scriptcs/#comment-918376009</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Looks very interesting. Thanks for pointing this out.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JanVanRyswyck</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2013 01:59:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Taking Baby Steps with ScriptCS</title><link>http://elegantcode.com/2013/05/31/taking-baby-steps-with-scriptcs/#comment-917649303</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Will Roslyn ever run on Mono? You might be interested in a project with a different goal - &lt;a href="https://github.com/nosami/Omnisharp" rel="nofollow"&gt;https://github.com/nosami/Omni...&lt;/a&gt; . It's full project development (intellisense, project navigation, refactoring etc.) without VS and runs on Windows, Linux and OSX. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Would sure be interesting to combine the two though.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jason Imison</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2013 10:37:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Taking Baby Steps with ScriptCS</title><link>http://elegantcode.com/2013/05/31/taking-baby-steps-with-scriptcs/#comment-915950714</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Very cool! Thanks for the update on the deployment story. Looking forward to see this in action.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JanVanRyswyck</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 01 Jun 2013 10:22:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Taking Baby Steps with ScriptCS</title><link>http://elegantcode.com/2013/05/31/taking-baby-steps-with-scriptcs/#comment-915756614</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Nice post Jan! Glad you are finding scriptcs useful!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;On the binaries, we have a PR waiting to be merged right now which will by default always create a binary which will be recompiled when the scripts are changed. We will still support in-memory compilation as we do now.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;As the exporter you mentioned, that's more about offering a way to grow up a script project to a full blown VS project. Having script packs complicates achieving this, but we believe it is still doable.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Looking forward to seeing what you do with it and more posts from you in the future. Oh and also any contributions to the code base :-)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Glenn Block</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 01 Jun 2013 02:03:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Developer humor</title><link>http://elegantcode.com/2013/05/09/developer-humor/#comment-904066385</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hilarious!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Pablo</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 13:29:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Author Report: Daniel Suarez</title><link>http://elegantcode.com/2013/05/17/author-report-daniel-suarez/#comment-903358452</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I just finished Threat Vector by Tom Clancy.  It takes on cyberwarfare.  I just downloaded 'Daemon' and am looking forward to listening to it on my way home tonight.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Aaron Jackson</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 17:26:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Author Report: Daniel Suarez</title><link>http://elegantcode.com/2013/05/17/author-report-daniel-suarez/#comment-901125141</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I don't know how old you guys are but maybe age isn't a good excuse for not knowing Daniel Suarez's work. I turn 51 tomorrow and have read, or rather listened to, all three of his books.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Kill Decision is a techno-thriller like the first two but adds more scientific detail, with looks at insect swarming behaviour. It also has a slightly more military angle.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I've listened to the &lt;a href="http://Audible.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;Audible.com&lt;/a&gt; audio versions, all narrated by Jeff Gurner who does a good job of bringing the stories to life. If there are any of the three you've yet to buy then I'd suggest giving the audio version some consideration.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve Crane</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 08:22:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Author Report: Daniel Suarez</title><link>http://elegantcode.com/2013/05/17/author-report-daniel-suarez/#comment-900933459</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If not having heard of Daniel Suarez is an indicator of agedness then I must be older than you! Thanks for the recommendation. I will read this on my new long bus commute to the eastside.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris Bilson</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 00:08:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Developer humor</title><link>http://elegantcode.com/2013/05/09/developer-humor/#comment-900911433</link><description>&lt;p&gt;These really are great. Good post made my day. Thanks, Jason.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David Starr</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 23:12:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Developer humor</title><link>http://elegantcode.com/2013/05/09/developer-humor/#comment-892320751</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great tool for developers wanting to make their content multilingual:  Ackuna.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://Ackuna.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;Ackuna.com&lt;/a&gt; let's you upload your source files and get the text translated for free. No extra formatting involved.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Couldn't start a new thread, so thought I'd post it here.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Lackuna</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 11:34:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Developer humor</title><link>http://elegantcode.com/2013/05/09/developer-humor/#comment-892089958</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Brilliant!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Georgi Hadzhigeorgiev</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 07:24:14 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>